Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57708 (ALL)

MANEESH @ KHANNA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/9757/2025 · 2025-05-14

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80297-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9757 of 2025 Petitioner :- Maneesh @ Khanna Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Pratap Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-X,J. 1. Heard Sri Aditya Pratap Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ajay Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for informant, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. Prayer made in the writ petition to quash the First Information Report dated 2.1.2025, registered as Case Crime No.0007 of 2025, under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1) and added Section 103(1) of BNS, at Police Station Hathras Gate, District Hathras. 3. On the other hand, learned AGA on the instructions states that during investigation Section 103 of B.N.S. is also added against the petitioner and the investigation is in progress. 4. After substantial argument, once the court has declined to quash the impugned first information report, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed and leave may be accorded to invoke the remedy as available in law. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed leaving it open for the petitioner to apply before the competent court for anticipatory bail/bail as permissible under law and in accordance with law. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 15.5.2025/Mukesh Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad