Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57702 (AP)

SRI VENKATESWARA UNIVERSITY v. K M R LAW COLLEGE

WA/1117/2025 · 2025-10-27

Challa Gunaranjan, Dhiraj Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010530132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER ? TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND THE HONOURABLE SRr JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT APPEAL NO: 1117^ND 1119 OF 2025 ^ WRIT APPEAL NO: 1117 OF 2025^ Writ Appeal under clause 15 the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 31.12.2024 passed in I.A. No. 1 of 2025 in W.P. No. 5757 of 2025 _ on the file of the High Court. ^ ^ ^ ^ ' Between: 1. Sri Venkateswara Universi^Yr Represented by its Registrar Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam. Prakasam Road, Tirupati District Andhra Pradesh - 517502. 2. Sri Venkateswara University, Represented by its Vice Chancellor, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvbvidy^layam. Prakasam Road, Tirupati District, Andhra Pradesh - 517502. Sri ...Appellants/ Res 4 & 5^ AND 1. K M R Law College, Represented by its Correspondent Prasad, Nagari Road, Parameswaramangalam, District. Sri K.T. Puttur, Tirupathi ...Respondent/ Writ Petitioner / / / / / Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education. Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. ..c: 3. The Andhra Pradesh State Gouncil for Higher Education, Governmerit Represented by its Secretary, Neeladri Towers, 6"' 2. The State of Andhra of Andhra Pradesh, Battalion Road, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh. Represented by its Member Secretary, 21, Rouse Near Bal Bhawan, New Delhi - 110 002. ...Respondents 4. Bar Council of India, Avenue, Institutional Area lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 1S1 CP-C is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in srippdft of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order dated 15.09.2025 passed in . 57#'Of 2025 by the Hon’ble High Court of AP I.A. No.1 of 2025 in W.P. No at Amaravati, pending disposal of tfie above Writ Appeal. ^ Counsel for the Petitioners: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL, SRf RAMESH BABU TALLURI sc For, S.V:ONIVERSITY,TIRUPATI Counsel for the Respondent No.1 :SRI N SUBBA RAO, Sr Counsel Representing SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI Respondent No.2:'GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Counsel for the Respondent NO.SrMS K RADHIKA ^ Counsel for the RespondentsrG VENKATA REDDY ^ WRIT APPEAL NO: 1119 OF 20^# Writ Appeal under clause order dated 15.09.2025 passed-in I.A. No. 1 of 2025 in 2025 on the file of the High Court. Between: # 6fThe Letters Patent preferred against the W.P. No. 5753 of f 1. Sri Venkateswara University,, Represented by its Registrar Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam. Prakasam Road, Tirupati District, Andhra Pradesh - 517502 2. Sri Venkateswara University,' Represented by its Vice Chancellor, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam. Prakasam Road, Tirupati District, Andhra Pradesh - 517502. Sri / ...Appellants/ Res 4 & 5 AND 1. Rayalaseema Law College, Represented by its Correspondent, Yarrapu Reddy Anand Chandragiri Mandal, Tirupathi District. Sri. Chinthagunta Village, Sanambatia ...Respondent/ Writ Petitioner 2. The State of Andhra Pracfesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 3. The Andhra Pradesh State Council for Higher Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Secretary, Neeladri Towers, 6th Battalion Road, Mangalagifi,-Andhra Pradesh. 4. Bar Council of India, Represented by its Member Secretary, Avenue, Institutional Area, Near Bal Bhawan, New Delhi - 110 002. ...Respondents Respondents 21, Rouse lAN0j10F_2^5 ^ Petition under Section 15fcPC i^ filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation'of the Order dated 15.09.2025 passed in I.A. No.1 of 2025 in W.P. No. 575f5f 2025 by the Hon’ble High Court of AP at Amaravati, pending disposal 'df the above Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Petitioners: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL, SRI RAMESH BABU TALLURI SC For S.V.UNIVERSITY.TIRUPATI Counsel for the Respondent No.1:SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI Counsel for the Respondent No:2- GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MS K RADHIKA Counsel for the Respondent No.4:SRI G VENKATA REDDY The Court made the following Common order: •j' .«■- APHC010530132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Sr.No:-ii8 AT AMARAVATI [3552] WRIT APPEAL Nos: 1117 & 1119 of 2025 W.A. No.1117of2025 Sri Venkateswara University and Others ...Appellant(s) Vs. K.M.R Law College and Others ...Respondent(s) ‘kicieieieic-k-k-kic Advocate(s) for Appellant(s); The Advocate General, Mr. Ramesh BabuTalluri, SC for S.V.University,Tirupati Mr. N. Subba Rao, Senior Counsel, appearing vice Mr. Sri Vijay Mathukumilli; Mr.G Venkata Reddy, Mrs. K Radhika Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 28^” October 2025 PC : The present Writ Appeals bearing Nos.1117 & 1119 of 2025 have been preferred against the common order, dated 15.09.2025, passed by the learned single Judge in I.A. No.1 of 2025 in W.P. Nos. 5757 & 5753 of 2025 respectively whereby the University was directed to consider the case of the petitioners - Institutions for uploading their data in JnanaBhumi web portal within a period of ten days. 2 HCJ a CGR, J - W.A. Nos:1117 a 1119 of 2025 Learned Advocate General appearing for the appellants would submit that while the direction with regard to considering the case of the petitioners is order of consideration would be passed; however, since the fixed at only ten days, the said order of consideration, according to the University, could not be passed within the said timeline. Learned counsel for the respondent - Institutions would submit that if the order of consideration is passed within a period of ten days from today, they would not press the orders, dated 15.09.2025, in contempt. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the appellants seeks to withdraw the present writ appeals. Accordingly, the Writ Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. concerned, an timeline was Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. / deputy registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, THE ADVOCATE GENERAL, High Court of Andhra 1. Two CC to Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] CC to SRI. RAMESH BABU TALLURI, SC For 2. One S.V.UNIVERSITY,TIRUPATI [OPUC] GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, High Court of Andhra 3. Two CCs to Pradesh [OUT] 4. One CC to SRI. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI, Advocate [OPUC] - 5. One CC to SRI. G VENKATA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to MS K RADHIKA., Advocate [OPUC] X 7. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:28/10/2025 COMMON JUDGMENT WA NO. 1117 & 1119 OF 2025 ^ 3 0 OCT 2025 J ^*VQi!2*nt SectiMX,5^ & 09' DISMISSING BOTH THE WRIT APPEALS AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS