Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:53573
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3292 of 2025 1 - Naveen Tandi S/o Sukh Tandi Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Baitari P.S. Saraipali District - Mahasamund (C.G.) 2 - Manju Chouhan W/o Vishwajeet Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Bagaijor P.S. Saraipali District - Mahasamund (C.G.) 3 - Akash Sinde S/o Maruti Sinde Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Narayangaon Pune P.S. Naragaon Tahsil Junner District - Pune Maharashtra.
... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer P.S. Saraipali District - Mahasamund (C.G.)
... Non-applicant(s) For Applicants : None For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
Order on Board 03.11.2025
1. This is an ofÏce reference.
2. This Court, vide order dated 23.07.2024 passed in MCRC No. 4083 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicants, namely, Naveen Tandi, Manju Chouhan and Akash Sinde had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN
2 with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, if there was no legal impediment.
3. Earlier on one occasion also, this Court had granted extension of time for compliance of the order dated 23.07.2024.
4. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Saraipali District-Mahasamund (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 14.10.2025 has requested for grant of four months time for concluding the trial.
5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that in the present case, the case was fixed for securing the presence of the accused persons. Accused Naveen Tandi and accused Manju Chauhan are residents of District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, and accused Akash Sinde is a resident of District Pune, Maharashtra. Arrest warrants were issued against the accused, however, due to their absence, further proceedings in the case could not be carried out within the prescribed time limit. Because of the absence of the accused persons, it is respectfully submitted that after securing their presence, further proceedings will be conducted and the case will be disposed of at the earliest. Therefore, he prays for grant of four months further time for concluding the trial.
6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is
directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of four months from today.
7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction.
8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Kunal