Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 15.07.2025 RSA-4258-2005 (O&M)
ANOOP SINGH DALAL AND ORS.
... APPELLANTS VS. HUDA .. RESPONDENT RSA-4259-2005 (O&M)
ANOOP SINGH DALAL & OTHERS ... APPELLANTS VS. HUDA .. RESPONDENT COCP-845-2007 (O&M)
AMIR CHAND KATHURIA
... PETITIONER VS. V.S.HOODA .. RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate, for the appellant(s)/petitioner. Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Advocate, for the respondent(s). **** ROHIT KAPOOR
, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/petitioner states that she has made repeated attempts to contact the appellants but remains unsuccessful and has no instructions in the matters. Dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the appellants/petitioner to revive the same, if any cause of action survives. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected files. 15.07.2025
(ROHIT KAPOOR) smriti
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SMRITI 2025.07.17 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment