GORAKH YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF UP AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/15266/2025 · 2025-05-20
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57699 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57699 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:85602 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15266 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gorakh Yadav And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manvendra Narain Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Issue an order on direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to 7 not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioners over the land in dispute in the garb of case under Section 24 of U.P Revenue Code, 2006 (Ram Bahadur Vs. Gram Sabha & others). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the police authorities/ respondent no.5 as well as respondent no.8 & 9 not to create any hindrance in the possession of the petitioners over the plot in dispute."
3. In prayer no.(i) (quoted above), allegation has been made that respondents No.2 to 7 i.e. District Magistrate, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsildar, Station House Officer, Revenue Inspector and Lekhpal, are interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioners over the land in dispute in the garb of proceedings u/s 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
4. On inquiry being made by this Court to the petitioners to point out the allegation with regard to interference by the District Magistrate and other authorities in the peaceful possession of petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioners referred to paragraph 15 of the writ petition which is as under :-
"15. That from perusal of order sheet, it appears that no final order has been passed in the aforesaid suit under section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code but the respondent no.3 to 7 are pressurizing the petitioners to vacate the abadi land."
5. In view of the above, the writ petition is wholly vague and is therefore, dismissed. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad