- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37938 WP No. 722 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 722 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. K CHUDAMANI W/O SRI K V VENKATESH AGED 52 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE ADD: NO. 1370/4/3/5 TIRUMALA NILAYA, HOSAHATTI LAYOUT KODAGEHALLI, SAHAKARA NAGARA BENGALURU - 560 092 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DALWAI VENKATESH.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN BANGALURU - 560 001 2. THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR YELAHANKA TQ BENGALURU - 560 098. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 30.11.2021 PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNX-D, QUASH THE SALE ORDER DTD 06.1.2022 ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNX-E AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37938 WP No. 722 of 2022 ORAL ORDER On the previous occasion, this Court has passed the following order : "Matter is called out. There is no representation for the impleading applicants. Although, learned the counsel for the petitioner submits that 10 out of 12 award amounts have been cleared by the petitioner and what remains to be cleared is only 2 and the amount may be around Rs.25,00,000/-, while the property in question Rs.9,50,00,000/- even as on 12.11.2020, nevertheless since there is no representation for the impeding applicants who are the decree holders, re-list this matter on 19.09.2025 to enable the impleading applicants to have their say. It is made clear that this Court will proceed to dispose of the writ petition on the next date of hearing." 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the impleading applicants. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has today filed a memo along with the list of cases which have been settled by the petitioner's husband. According to the petitioner, the case in EA 214/14 and 213/14 are only remaining for consideration. 4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is partly allowed, while setting aside the impugned order at Annexure- - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37938 WP No. 722 of 2022 D dated 30.11.2021. The Tahsildar, Yelahanka Taluk is permitted to make a communication to the District Consumer Forum, Bengaluru in proceedings EA.214/14 and EA.213/14 and seek appropriate orders. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rs List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45