Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 49418 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2024 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Nunu Yadav @ Vikash Yadav son of Ram Kishor yadav Resident of Village -Trimuhani Ward No.10 Police Station -Bahera District -Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 11-08-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 132, 121(1), 121(2), 74, 109, 125(b), 191(2) of the B.N.S.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act and the informant alleges that one Ranjit was apprehended based on trap in the case of liquor but crowd gathered and attacked the force with lathi, danda, stone, bamboo etc. and even misbehaved with Puja who was video-graphing the occurrence, thereafter accused persons snatched the seized liquor from the constable Chandan and also took out liquor from the dickey of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 49418 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 motorcycle and freed Ranjit. 4. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the date of occurrence is 06.10.2024 and the FIR came to be instituted on 08.10.2024 i.e. after a delay of two days. It is next submitted that since petitioner stays nearby to the place of occurrence, as such he came to be implicated. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bahera P.S. Casse No.382/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T