Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57682 (MAD)

Y.Abdul Munaf v. P.Gunaprakasam

CRL MP/9996/2025 · 2025-06-02

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P.No.9996 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.No.605 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.M.P.No.9996 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.No.605 of 2025 Y.Abdul Munaf ... Petitioner Vs P.Gunaprakasam ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to exempt the petitioner to surrender before the appellate court on the Judgment dated 14.02.2025 made in C.A.No.20 of 2024 on the file of the Court of II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchengode confirming the Judgment dated 27.11.2023 made in STC.No.279 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam. For Petitioner : Mr.C.S.Saravanan ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to exempt the petitioner to surrender before the appellate court by the Judgment dated 14.02.2025 made in C.A.No.20 of 2024, on the file of the Court of II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchengode, thereby confirming the Judgment dated 27.11.2023 made in STC.No.279 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.9996 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.No.605 of 2025 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record. 3. The petitioner is an accused in the complaint lodged by the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in STC.No.279 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam. After full-fledged trial, the Trial Court convicted the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo one year simple imprisonment. Aggrieved by same, the petitioner preferred an appeal in C.A.No.20 of 2024 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchengode and the same was dismissed, confirming the sentence imposed by the Trial Court. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred revision before this Court along with this application to exempt him from surrendering before the Trial Court. 4. Both the Trial Court as well as Appellate Court convicted the petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Without surrendering before the Trial Court, the petitioner filed this petition seeking exemption from surrender. Therefore, the petitioner failed to make out https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.9996 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.No.605 of 2025 a prima facie case for granting exemption and this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition seeking exemption from surrender before the lower court. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. 02.06.2025 (½) Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order mn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.9996 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.No.605 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn To 1. The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchengode. 2. The Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.M.P.No.9996 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.No.605 of 2025 02.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis