APHC010559142025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29134/2025 Between: 1. BHOOMIREDDY VENKATA LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 7-169/A, 4TH LINE, HANUMAN NAGAR, SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. CHIMATA MAHESH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O CHIMATA CHANDU, VARALA BAZAAR SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. CHALLA DHANA LAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O CHALLA BRAHMESHWARAO HANUMAN NAGAR, SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDA PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. CHIMATA PADMAVATHI, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O CHIMATA 2 NARAYANA, VARALA BAZAAR, SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. BUDALA RAJINI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, W/O BUDALA RAJESH, KANDUKUR ROAD(CHURCH BACK SIDE HOUSE) SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 9. MADDASANI RAJINI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,. W/O BRAHMAIAH, R/O. HANUMAN NAGAR SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 10. KOKKILIGADDA PADMA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, C/O HANUMANTH RAO, R/O. VAINALA GOVINDAMA NILAYAM 2ND FLOOR OPPOSITE OLD PETROL, SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 11. MANDALI SUDHAVANI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, C/O MANDALI KISHORE, HANUMAN NAGAR SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 12. CHIMATA LAKSHMI DEVI, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, C/O. CHIMATA SREENU, R/O. NEAR BY DARGAH STREET SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 13. KANDUKURI RAMANAYA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O KANDUKURI PADMAVATHI R/O. CINEMA HALL STREET, SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MA PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 14. KURAPATI LAVANYA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, C/O KURAPATI BASKAR REDDY HANUMAN NAGAR, SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 15. YANNAM NAGAMALLESHWARI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, C/O YANAM BASKAR, JAGANNA COLONY SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 16. GUNTUPALLI JYOTHI, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, C/O GUNTUPALLI SREENU, HANUMAN NAGAR SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 17. PALLA VARALAKSHMI, (CONDUCTOR) AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, C/O PALLA BASKAR, PAKHIR PALEM SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3 18. GUNJI VARAMA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O. GUNJI PUNAYA, HANUMAN NAGAR SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SUJAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29134 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not registering the FIR basing on the Complaint Dt. 09.10.2025 made by the petitioner against the Un-official Respondents No. 5 to 18 is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of article 14, and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No. 4 to register the FIR based on above said complaint and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri R.Sujan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions, would submit that since the subject matter in the present petition is civil in nature, the respondent police have not registered the FIR on the complaint made by the petitioner dated 09.10.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no Order as to costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse her remedies before the appropriate forum according to law. 5 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 27.10.2025. UPS 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29134 of 2025 Dated.27.10.2025 UPS 08