THOTA TATA RAO, KRISHNA DT., v. THE STATE OF AP., REP PP AND ANR.,
CRLRC/3194/2016 · 2025-10-26
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57658 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57658 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010604522016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3194 OF 2016 Between:
1. THOTA TATA RAO, S/O. JAGANNADHAM, INDIAN, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, KAPU, EX-PRESIDENT, VISWANADHAPALLI VILLAGE, KODURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, AND FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. BADARLA NANCHARAIAH, S/O. VENKATA SWAMY, INDIAN, 59 YEARS, KAPU, EX-SECRETARY, AVANIGADDA, AVANIGADDA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this memorandum of grounds of Crl.Rc; aggrieved by the part of the order, dt. 17-11-2016 passed in Cri.M.P. No. 1979 of 2016 in C.C. No. 56 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Avanigadda, Krishna District against the petitioner/2nd Accused i.e. to the extent of order to summoning the documents referred in the counter i.e. (1). A letter dt. 07-06-2001 addressed by 2"d Accused to the Branch Manager, KDCC Bank, Koduru, (2). Proceedings of the meetings y resolution dt. 27-06-1998, Original of the particulars of receipts and payments
2
for the year 01-04-1997 to 31-03-1998 signed by the 2"d Accused and others, (3). Balance sheet dt. 31-03-1998 and (4). pamphlet dt.27-09-2001 issued by PACS, Viswanathapalli village in respect of Mahajana Sabha meeting under the supervision of 1st Accused and 2nd Accused and also receipt dt. 20-05- 2011 an amount of Rs.85,735/- paid by 2nd Accused etc., IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 4993 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in CC No. 56 of 2014 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Avanigadda, Krishna District, Pending Disposal of the above Revision Petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K HARI PRASAD K Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SRI K. SANDEEP, ASST.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
O R D E R
1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the order dated 17.11.2016 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1979 of 2016 in C.C.No.56 of 2014 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Avanigadda, Krishna District. 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 17.11.2016 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1979 of 2016 in C.C.No.56 of 2014. The Crl.M.P.No.1979 of 2016 is filed under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner/A.2 herein seeking to issue summons to the Secretary, PACS, Viswanadhapalli to cause production of representation dated 20.05.2011 submitted by the petitioner/A.2 to PACS
3
and to produce minutes for the years from 1995 to 2000 and to give evidence and the said petition is allowed. Against the said orders, the present revision is preferred. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor filed a copy from the eCourts website stating that the main C.C.No.56 of 2014 is disposed on
28.02.2020. 5. Recording the said submission of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and in view of the disposal of main C.C.No.56 of 2014 on 28.02.2020 as the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date: 27.10.2025 MS
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.3194 of 2016 Date: 27.10.2025
MS