Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57650 (PNJ)

SAT PAL KASHYAP v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/14303/2024 · 2025-07-14

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-14303-2024 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14303-2024 Date of Decision: 14.07.2025 Sat Pal Kashyap ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. R.S. Sihag, Advocate, for respondent No.2 JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 28.05.2024 whereby he had been placed under suspension. 2. On 01.07.2024, the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after passing of an order of retirement by the Managing Director on 23.05.2024 and after having received ‘No Dues Certificate’ pertaining to the petitioner, the petitioner has been suspended by the same officer i.e. Managing Director on 28.05.2024 vide Annexure P-1 when the petitioner was due to attain the age of superannuation on 31.05.2024 and the same was only because of mala fide on the part of the Managing Director. Notice of motion for 16.09.2024. Shivani Gupta 2025.07.15 13:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14303-2024 2 In the meantime, the impugned order by which the petitioner has been suspended shall remain stayed. It is further directed that the reply shall be filed by the Managing Director himself.” 3. Learned counsel for respondents submit that vide order dated 31.05.2024, the impugned suspension order was withdrawn and petitioner was reinstated, thus, instant petition has rendered infructuous. 4. There is no representation of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost his interest in pursuing instant petition. 5. Dismissed as having rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application within 3 months, if cause survives. 14.07.2025 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No Shivani Gupta 2025.07.15 13:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document