APHC010513372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 27246/2025 BETWEEN: 1. KATURI SRINIVASA RAO @ SRINU, S/o. CHINNA VENKATESWALU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. CHIRRAVURU VILLAGE, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. TAHSILDAR, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the highhanded action of respondents, particularly the 4th respondent in insisting the petitioner to vacate from his agricultural landed property admeasuring with an extents of Ac.0.41 Cents Covered by survey No. 133 and Ac.0.41 Cents Covered by Survey No. 133- A respectively and same was situated at Chirravuru Village in Tadepalli Mandal of Guntur District, without issuing any notice to petitioner and without following any known procedure established by law and declare the same as high handedly. illegally, arbitrary. Capricious Manner and unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice and 2 offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent, forthwith not to interfere with petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment in respect to the aforesaid agricultural landed properly and pass such other order or order. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s: ……to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the highhanded action of respondents, particularly the 4th respondent in insisting the petitioner to vacate from his agricultural landed property admeasuring with an extents of Ac.0.41 Cents Covered by survey No.133 and Ac.0.41 Cents Covered by Survey No.133-A respectively and same was situated at Chirravuru Village in Tadepalli Mandal of Guntur District, without issuing any notice to petitioner and without following any known procedure established by law and declare the same as high handedly, illegally, arbitrary, Capricious Manner and unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent, forthwith not to interfere with petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment in respect to the aforesaid agricultural landed property and pass such other order or orders….. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner got land to an extent of Ac.0-41 cents in Survey No.133A, Chirravuru Village, Tadepally Mandal, vide registered Gift Deed 4 No.12548/2019, dated 16.08.2019 and his name is reflected as Pattadar and enjoined in the Revenue Records and further stated that the petitioner submitted Online F-Line Application vide Application No.FSNV012500681478 and Transaction ID No.TAFSNV0 12500681478, dated 18.03.2025 for conducting of survey and fixing of boundaries of his agricultural landed property admeasuring with an extents of Ac.0.41 Cents Covered by survey No.133 and Ac.0.41 Cents Covered by Survey No.133-A respectively. 3. Given these circumstance, it is alleged that the subordinates of the 4th respondent are repeatedly visiting agricultural landed property, persistently disrupting the possession of the petitioner and insisting him to vacate from the agricultural landed property. When the petitioner went to the office of the 4th respondent requesting to drop the high handed action, the 4th respondent has humiliated the petitioner in abusive language in front of his office staff and intimidated that he has full powers and he can do anything. Hence, he sought a direction to the respondent authorities not to dispossess the petitioner from the scheduled property. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed written instructions addressed by the Tahsildar, Tadepally Mandal, it manifests that the respondent authorities have not tried to dispossess the petitioner from the enjoyment of the subject land and the F-Line 5 Application filed by the petitioner was also redressed on 29.03.2025, accordingly a speaking order was also issued to the petitioner vide proceedings in Rc.No.355/2025-A, dated 15.09.2025 and further stated that all the allegations leveled by the petitioner are not true and are baseless. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. The respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioner without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 28.10.2025 Harin 6 192 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO W.P.No. 27246 OF 2025 Date: 28-10-2025 Harin