Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57642 (AP)

Anumakonda Hima Bindu v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/6093/2019 · 2025-10-26

B V L N Chakravarthi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010139432019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6093/2019 Between: 1. ANUMAKONDA HIMA BINDU, W/O. A. SIVA KIRAN, AGED 35 YEARS OCC ADVOCATE, R/O. H.NO. 4-16-25/2, 3/1 BHARATPET, GUNTUR-522 002 ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PATTABHIPURAM POLICE STATION GUNTUR TOWN, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V LAKSHMI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.6093 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action on the part of the respondent nos. 2 and 3 in not registered the crime on the basis of the report dated 10/04/2019 for taking action against the persons who have committed the cognizable offences i.e., trespass, threaten to kill and tried to kidnap the petitioner etc., is illegal and arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of India and issue consequential direction to the Respondents to register the crime and take action against the accused in accordance with law and pass…” 2. Smt.P.Namratha Chowdary, learned counsel representing Sri V.V.Lakshmi Narayana, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 27.10.2025 Pmk 3 44 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:6093 OF 2019 Date: 27.10.2025 Pmk