Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57638 (AP)

Medikonda Krishna Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/30257/2021 · 2025-10-26

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010503522021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30257 OF 2021 Between: 1. Medikonda Krishna Rao,, S/o. Raghaviah, Aged 53 years, Occ R/o. Sankarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 2. Mandalapu Narasimha Rao,, S/o. Venkataiah, Aged 45 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o. Sankarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 3. Vajja Bramhaiah,, S/o. Singaiah, Aged 45 years, Occ Vemparla Village, Addanki Mandal, Prakasam District. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Inspector of Police, Darsi Circle, Prakasam District. 4. The Station House Officer, Mundlamuru Police Station, Prakasam District. 5. Medikonda Surya Prakash, S/o. Rama Rao, Aged about 30 years,R/o Sankarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 30257 OF 2021 1. Medikonda Krishna Rao,, S/o. Raghaviah, Aged 53 years, Occ- R/o. Sankarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 2. Mandalapu Narasimha Rao,, S/o. Venkataiah, Aged 45 years, Occ , R/o. Sankarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam 3. Vajja Bramhaiah,, S/o. Singaiah, Aged 45 years, Occ- Cultivation, R/o. Vemparla Village, Addanki Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur 2. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Inspector of Police, Darsi Circle, Prakasam District. icer, Mundlamuru Police Station, Prakasam District. 5. Medikonda Surya Prakash, S/o. Rama Rao, Aged about 30 years,R/o Sankarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Cultivation, R/o. Sankarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 2. Mandalapu Narasimha Rao,, S/o. Venkataiah, Aged 45 years, Occ- , R/o. Sankarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam Cultivation, R/o. ...Petitioners its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur icer, Mundlamuru Police Station, Prakasam District. 5. Medikonda Surya Prakash, S/o. Rama Rao, Aged about 30 years,R/o 6. Medikonda Rama Rao, S/o. Chinnaiah, Aged about 55 years, R/o. Sankarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS aggrieved by the action of respondents, particularly the 4th respondent at the instance of respondents 5 and 6 in repeatedly insisting petitioners to appear before the 4th respondent police station and insisting them to vacate and deliver the Land of Ac. 2.59 Cents covered by Sy. No- 75/4, of Sankarapuram Revenue Village in Mundlamuru Mandal of Prakasam District to respondents 5 and 6, as illegal, irregular, irrational, arbitrary, without any authority or sanction of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in any manner with 1' petitioner's possession over the said lands and petitioners' personal liberty and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents, particularly 4th respondent not to insist petitioners to appear before his authority nor interfere in any manner with petitioners' personal liberty and possession over the Land of Ac. 2.59 Cents covered by Sy. No- 75/4, of Sankarapuram Revenue Village in Mundlamuru Mandal of Prakasam District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: V.N.V.SURYA DATTU Counsel for the Respondents: G V L MURHTY Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30257 OF 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS aggrieved by the action of respondents, particularly the 4th respondent at the instance of respondents 5 and 6 in repeatedly insisting petitioners to appear before the 4th respondent police station and insisting them to vacate and deliver the Land of Ac. 2.59 Cents covered by Sy. No- 75/4, of Sankarapuram Revenue Village in Mundlamuru Mandal of Prakasam District to respondents 5 and 6, as illegal, irregular, irrational, arbitrary, without any authority or sanction of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in any manner with 1' petitioner's possession over the said lands and petitioners' personal liberty and pass....” 2. Heard Sri V.N.V.Surya Dattu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are interfering in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 27.10.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30257 of 2021 Dated: 27.10.2025 KKV