APHC010569622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29396/2025 Between: 1.K DORASWAMY NAIDU,, S/O. K VENGAMA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, R/O. FLAT 404, A BLOCK, AMOGAYA WILLOW TREE APARTMENT, UPPERPALLI ROAD, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MR PALLI POLICE STATION, TIMPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4.M SUNIL KUMAR, S/O. M. RAJ GOPAL NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.507, SWANMUKHI TOWERS, TANAPALLI CROSS, TIRUCHANUR POST, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SOMISETTY GANESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29396 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, more particularly a writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 & 3 interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members without any legal cause, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner by summoning him to the police station and to pass …” 2. Heard Sri S.Nagesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and unofficial respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the subject matter is pertaining to civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. The police are not interfering in the civil disputes between parties. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 3 6. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.10.2025. SAB 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29396 of 2025 Dated.24.10.2025 SAB 69