IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46226 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2025 Thana- KASMA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1. Nilkamal Singh, Son of Kameshwar Singh, Resident of village - Arthua, P.S.- Kasma, District - Aurangabad. 2. Shashikant Singh @ Shashikant Kumar, Son of Kameshwar Singh, Resident of village - Arthua, P.S.- Kasma, District - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 03-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Kasma P.S. Case No. 76 of 2015 for the offence registered under Sections 329(4), 126 (2), 115(2), 109(2), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. 3. Allegation against the petitioners is that both the petitioners along with other co-accused persons entered the house of the informant and assaulted her with khanti, iron rod and gaita. They also snatched her mangalsutra and ear-ring and tore her clothes. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46226 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case due to previous enmity. He has further submitted that both the parties are co-villagers and are on litigating terms. The injury found on the person injured is simple in nature. There is no recovery of any iron rod or khanti from the spot. Petitioners are in jail custody since 09.06.2025 having no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned counsels appearing on behalf of the State and informant oppose the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions on behalf of the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below in Kasma P.S. Case No. 76 of 2025. khushbu/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T