Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57630 (BOM)

DIWAKAR S/O POSHATTI MYAKALWAR v. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR AND OTHERS

CAW/2850/2025 · 2025-12-15

Shri Pravin S Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

26 wp 1619-2019.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.2850/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.2849/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1619/2019 Diwakar s/o Poshatti Myakalwar Vs. The Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri A.D. Dangore, Advocate for petitioner Ms R.V. Sharma, AGP for respondents/State CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATE : 15.12.2025 1. By these applications, the applicant sought condonation of delay in bringing the legal representatives of deceased petitioner on record. 2. The petitioner has stated on oath that original petitioner has been expired on 16.08.2024 leaving behind the legal representatives and stated their names and details. 3. In view of the fact that right to sue survive, in favour of the legal representatives of the original petition. For the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed. 4. Necessary amendment be carried out within one week. 5. List the matter after Christmas Vacation, 2025. (PRAVIN S. PATIL J.) R.S. Sahare