SURENDRA PANJAB PUNDKAR AND 2 OTHERS v. MOHD.IBADULLAKHAN ABDULLAKHAN AND 11 OTHERS
CAS/979/2024 · 2025-05-02
Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57620 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57620 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Order 0205cas979.24 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION [CAS] NO. 979/2024 IN SECOND APPEAL
NO. 434
/2007.
Surendra Panjab Pundkar and others. -VERSUS- Mohd.Ibadullakhan Abdullakhan and others. Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Shri P.A. Deshpande, Advocate for Appellants.
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATE : MAY 02, 2025.
None appears for proposed respondent no.9, though duly served. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.
2. In the present Civil Application it is stated that respondent no.9 - Kalawati has expired, however, prior to her demise, the deceased respondent no.9 has transferred the suit property vide sale deed dated
09.06.2008. Copy of Index-II of the sale deed is filed on record. In view of above, Civil Application is allowed. Name of Pramod Gulabrao Ingale is allowed to be substituted in place of deceased respondent no.9 Rgd.
Order 0205cas979.24 2 Kalawati. Necessary amendment be carried out on or before 09.05.2025.
3. Issue notice of Second Appeal to respondent no.9, returnable on 11.06.2025. In addition to regular mode of service, appellants are permitted to serve respondent no.9 by private mode as permissible in law.
JUDGE
Rgd.