Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57618 (CAL)

MD HASMAT v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

WPO/888/2024 · 2025-02-05

Kausik Chanda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OD –11 WPO/888/2024 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE MD. HASMAT. -VERSUS- THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA Date: 5thFebruary, 2025 Appearance: Mr. Ashim Kr. Roy, Adv. Mr. Sutanu Chakrabarti, Adv. ...for the petitioner. Mr. Achintya Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Swapan Kumar Debnath, Adv. ...for the KMC. Mr. Anand Farmania, Adv. Mr. Manoj Malhottra, Adv. Mr. Sabyasachi Mondal, Adv. Ms. Indumouli Banerjee, Adv. ...for the State. The Court: The petitioner claims to be a thika tenant in respect of premises no. 5/2 and 5/2F, Tiljala Road, P.S. Beniapukur, Kolkata- 700046. The petitioner alleges that although respondent no. 10 has no legal right concerning the said property, he is attempting to demolish a common privy and bathroom, and is obstructing the petitioner’s ingress and egress by erecting a corrugated tin structure. It is my view that the present writ petition is not the appropriate forum for adjudicating this dispute. 2 The Corporation has submitted that a corrugated tin structure does not fall within the definition of "building" under the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. Consequently, the Corporation lacks jurisdiction over the alleged unauthorized construction. In light of this, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner from seeking redress through the appropriate forum, including the relevant Thika Controller. WPO/888/2024 is, accordingly, disposed of. (KAUSIK CHANDA, J.) A/s.