Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5761 (CHH)

SANJU KUMAR CHANDRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPPIL/31/2025 · 2025-02-20

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:8813-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPPIL No. 31 of 2025 Sanju Kumar Chandra S/o Shri Prem Singh Chandra Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Akalsara (Kegrabhat) P.O. Akalsara P.S. Baradwar Tahisl Jaijaipur District - Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Secretariat At Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Sakti District - Sakti (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer Sakti District - Sakti (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Jaijaipur District - Sakti (C.G.) 5 - District Mining Officer Sakti District - Sakti (C.G.) 6 - Arvind Soni S/o Shri Teknath Soni R/o Portha, Tahsil - Sakti District - Sakti (C.G.) ...Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Jai Prakash Shukla, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri PN Bharat, Advocate General --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 20.02.2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition for the following reliefs:- Wppil 31 of 2025 2 10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to call the entire records pertaining to this case. 10.2 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari/prohibition thereby to quash the impugned order dated 04.12.2024 passed by Collector, Sakti, in revenue case no 202407310100001/B-121/2024-25 after declaring lit unconstitutional, illegal and arbitrary. 10.3 Hon’ble court may kindly further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to address the grievances of the petitioner/villagers made in written in respect of illegalities being carried on by res no.6 in dolomite mining, on cost of vested fundamental right of petitioners/villagers. 10.4 Hon’ble Court may kindly further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to conduct enquiry regarding illegality/breach of conditions committed by the lease holder Arvind Soni/res no 6, in carrying on mining work in land bearing khasra no.1263/1 area 4.047 out of area 5.261 hec, and to take lawful action against the lease holder, in accordance with law, and direct him to re-compensate for the damages caused to the livelihood condition of villagers, Wppil 31 of 2025 3 and further to pass any order which deems fit including cost of the petition in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to file afresh after depositing the security deposit as per rules. 3. Prayer allowed. 4. Accordingly, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice padma