1 APHC010062302021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3900/2021 Between: 1. KATARUDASARADHARAMAIAH, RADHA KRISHNAIAH, AGED 68 YEARS, CHAVATAPALEM VILLAGE, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME (PRISONS.62 DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, VIJAYAWADA, A.P. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PRISONS, CENTRAL JAIL, NELLORE, A.P. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION VENKATACHALAM, SPSR NELLORE, A.P ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 to 4 in not granting special remission though I am eligible as per the guidelines issued in GO Ms No. 94 Home (Parole-HRC) Department dated 27-08-2020, wherein the petitioner completed sentence of 9 years 8 months and 45 days and crossed the age of 65 years and also the action of the 3rd respondent in not according permission for temporary parole of 10 days to attend obsequies of my late father 2 KatariRadhakrishnalah who died on 11-02-2021, to be conducted from 23-02-2021 to 27-02-2021 at Krishnareddypalli with police escort as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to exercise special remission to the petitioner and enlarge him from jail pursuance of GO Ms No. 94 Home (Parole-HRC) Department dated 27-08-2020.” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 09.10.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.3900 of 2021 Dt..09.10.2025 ASR