R.Ramasubramaniam v. J.Radhakrishnan, I.A.S., and another
CONT P/1798/2024 · 2025-10-06
Krishnan Ramasamy
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57591 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57591 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CONT P No. 1798 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY CONT P No. 1798 of 2024 R.Ramasubramaniam New No.6/4, Old No.20/4, Vasan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai- 600 017. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.J.Radhakrishnan, I.A.S., The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Ribbon Buildings, Chennai 600 003. 2.B.Durai Raj, Assistant Revenue Officer, Zone X, Corporation of Chennai, No.117, NSK Road, Kodambakkam, Chennai. Contemnor(s) PRAYER:-Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt Act 1971, praying to pass an order punishing the respondents for not complying with the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 16.10.2023 in W.P. No.29954 of 2023 in accordance with law. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CONT P No. 1798 of 2024 For Petitioner : For Contemnor(s): Mr.C.Umashankar Mr.P.Prithvi Chopda Standing Counsel ORDER Alleging that the order of this Court dated 16.10.2023 passed in W.P. No.29954 of 2023, has not been complied with by the respondents, the present Contempt Petition came to be filed. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner's property has re-assessed as a Residential Property and the excess property tax, if any, being paid by the petitioner, the same will adjusted in the future property tax payment and hence, the order of this Court 16.10.2023 made in W.P. No.29954 of 2023 has been complied with. 3.The submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents is recorded. Hence, no further order is required in this present case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CONT P No. 1798 of 2024 4.In the event, the respondents failed to adjust the excess property tax being paid by the petitioner in the upcoming property tax payment, the petitioner shall give a representation to the respondents in this regard. In which case, the respondents shall consider the same. 5.In the result, this contempt petition stands closed. 06-10-2025 rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.J.Radhakrishnan, I.A.S., Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Ribbon Buildings, Chennai 600 003. 2.B.Durai Raj, Assistant Revenue Officer, Zone X, Corporation of Chennai, No.117, NSK Road, Kodambakkam, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CONT P No. 1798 of 2024 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. rst CONT P No. 1798 of 2024
06-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis