[2025:RJ-JP:7006] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 1663/2025 Ajeet Singh S/o Jagdish, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ajau, Police Station Kumher, District Bharatpur, At Present District Deeg. (Presently Confined At District Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Raghav with Mr. Ankur Singh Tomar For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 18/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 108/2015 registered at Police Station Sadar Gangapur City District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 302, 120B IPC and 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused application has submitted that the accused-applicant is sole bread earner of the family. It is further submitted that accused-applicant has been in judicial custody since 21.08.2023. It is also submitted that co-accused Rahul, has already been enlarged on bail, from whose residence the recovery has been effectuated. Learned counsel has submitted that charge-sheet has been filed during the trial of PW 1-5 and even in the FIR, name of the accused-applicant is not specified. [2025:RJ-JP:7006] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1663/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the present bail application and has submitted that the matter pertains to a heinous offence under Section 302, 120B of IPC and 3/25 of Arms Act. It is further submitted that there are two criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant. Further, it is submitted that accused-applicant has absconded for a long period. 4. Heard and considered. 3. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that there are two criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant; that accused-applicant has absconded for long period; that it can be deduced that the accused-applicant has been one of the prime abettors and prima facie looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon the merits/demerits, this court deems it appropriate to dismiss the instant bail application. 4. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed at this stage. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/1