Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57579 (KAR)

SRI SRIKANTESHWARA MULTIPURPOSE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9485/2021 · 2025-08-22

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32871 WP No. 9485 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.9485 OF 2021 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SRIKANTESHWARA MULTIPURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., (FORMERLY SRI KANNIKA PARAMESHWARI CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,) SHOP NO.14, VISVESWARAYA BHAVAN K R CIRCLE, MYSORE-570 001 REP. BY ITS CEO SRI U S RAMESH. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B S NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M S BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE MYSURU CITY-MYSURU-570 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R.1; SRI. HEMANTH P, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. GEETHA DEVI M.P., ADVOCATE FOR R.2) Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32871 WP No. 9485 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 19.01.2021 MADE IN REF.NO.R8[2]PR/255/2020-21 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2-MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, COPIES AT ANNEXURE- A., ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER 1. The writ petition is filed, challenging the notice issued by respondent no.2 calling upon the petitioner to vacate his shop. 2. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 upon instructions submits that the shop admittedly belong to respondent No.2 - the Mysuru Mahanagara Palike. However, the notice has been issued erroneously and hence, subsequently, the same has been withdrawn and appropriate proceedings under the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1974 has been initiated to have the petitioner evicted from the property. 3. It is seen that the writ petition pertains to issuance of impugned notice and nothing else. As the same has been - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32871 WP No. 9485 of 2021 withdrawn, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33