Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57578 (AP)

Kanakamedala Buchi Ramarao @Ramaiah v. Garikapati Jagan Mohan Rao

CRP/1798/2025 · 2025-10-09

Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010364372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI iV, FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1798 OF 2025 Petition under Section 115 of C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein Aggrieved by the order in CFR No.323/2024 in EP No.89 of 2020 in OS No. 6 of 2018 dated 22-02-2024 the High Court may be pleased to on the file of XI Additional District Judge, Tenali. Between: Kanakamedaia Buchi Ramarao ©Ramaiah, S/o. Venkateswara aged 65 years, Business, Dr.no.. 2.23.4, Lam Anjaiah Street, Nanduiapet Gandhinagar, Tenali Rao, Hindu ...Petitioner/Judgment-Debtor AND Garikapati Jagan Mohan Rao, S/o. Nagabhushanam, years, R/o. D.no. 11-4-1333/1, Denka road, Chenchupet, Tenali Hindu, aged about 61 ...Respondent/DHR lA NO: 2 OF 207^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to stay all further proceedings in EP No.89 /2020 in OS No. 6/2018 on the file of XI Additional District Judge, Tenali pending disposal of the CRP. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: -- The Court made the following: / APHC010364372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] >■ FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1798/2025 Between: BUCHI RAMARAO @RAMAIAH, S/0. HINDU,AGED 65 YEARS, BUSINESS, 2.23.4, LAM ANJAIAH STREET, NANDULAPET, 1.KANAKAMEDALA VENKATESWARA RAO DR.NO. GANDHINAGAR, TENALI ...PETITIONER AND 1.GARIKAPATI JAGAN MOHAN RAO, S/o. Nagabhushanam, Hindu, aged about 61 years, R/o. D.no. 11-4-1333/1, Denka road, Chenchupet, Tenali ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the order in CFR No.323/2024 in EP No.89 /2020 in OS No. 6/2018 dated22-02-2024 on the file of XI Additional District Judge, Tenali, lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to condone the delay of 404 days in filing the Civil Revision Petition against the orders in CFR No.323/2024 in EP No.89 /2020 in OS No. 6/2018 dated 22-02-2024 on the file of XI Additional District Judge, Tenali in the interest of justice. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in EP No.89 /2020 in OS No. 6 /2018 on the file of XI Additional District Judge, Tenalipending disposal of the CRP in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1798 of 2025 ORDER: Sri Madhukar Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner on record sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition, as per the instructions of his client. 2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs, sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- T. SRINIVASA RAO || ASSISTANT REGISTRAR As a //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER 5 To, 1. The XI Additional District Judge, Tenalt, Guntur District. 2. One CC to Sri. P Nagendra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies MKP sree i I 9^ HIGH COURT DATED; 10/10/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 1798 OF 2025 goTAND^. g( 17 OCT 2025 .n o> ^ ^^*urrent SectioaxV^ DISMISSING THE CRP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS