Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57566 (ALL)

RADHA KISHAN @ BANTOO v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHRS

CRLRD/1606/2023 · 2025-08-20

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144308 Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1606 of 2023 Revisionist :- Radha Kishan @ Bantoo Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Othrs Counsel for Revisionist :- Ambreesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Laxmi Dubey Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. 1. Sri Ambreesh Kumar, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Kunwar Tejendra Bahadur, learned AGA for the State are present, however, none present on behalf of O.P. No.2 even in revised call. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that revisionist is the husband of O.P. No.2 and by way of instant revision, he challenged the order passed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. but now matter between husband and wife i.e. revisionist and O.P. No.2 has been amicably settled, therefore, he does not want to press the instant revision, therefore, the instant revision may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Learned AGA is having no objection. 4. In view of the above, instant revision stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 KK Patel Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad