APHC010353962021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21520/2021 Between: S. MALLIKARJUNA REDDY, S/O. MALA KONDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC SCHOOL ASSISTANT, 0/O. Z.P.P.HIGH SCHOOL, KASUMURU VILLAGE, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. R/O. PLOT NO. 305, UNOTE FLORA APARTMENT, J.K.COLONY, GANDHI NAGAR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, UDAYAGIRI POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SRINIVASULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT YEARS, 0CC ASST SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UDAYAGIRI POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SARASWATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action of the Respondents no 4 and 5 in repeatedly insisting the petitioner to appear before their authority for settlement the matter which is not related to the petitioner with political party leaders support and declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and offends Articles 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 and 300-A of constitution of India and violative of provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and consequently direct the respondents no 1 to 3 to take necessary action on the petitioner complaint dated 30.04.2021, in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard Ms.P.Saraswathi, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the Police are not insisting the Petitioner and not harassing him to settle the matter. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to call the Petitioner, in the absence of any crime registered against him and not to harass him. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21520 of 2021 Dt.09.10.2025 Dinesh