Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57546 (KAR)

SMT. SUKANYA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/20779/2025 · 2025-07-14

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25867 WP No. 20779 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 20779 OF 2025 (S-TR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUKANYA WIFE OF K. RAJENDRA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT BEJAI, MUSEUM, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-575004 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHANANJAY JOSHI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI.PURNACHANDRA M PURANIK.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY 2. THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, NO.1, ALI ASKER ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25867 WP No. 20779 of 2025 GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, NO.1, ALI ASKER ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 4. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, UDUPI DISTRICT, RAJATHADRI, A BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES ENCLAVE, MANIPAL-576104 5. SRI. J. SUDHEER KUMAR, SON OF J. UMESH, AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT HARSHA, KAMATH THOTA, ULIYARAGOLI VILLAGE, KAUP TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-574106 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.T. KOLLAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. K. PRASANNA SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE MODIFIED ORDER DATED 30.06.2025 BEARING NO. RCS/SIBBANDHI-1/VARGAVANE/06/2025-26 PASSED BY THE R2 (ANNEXURE -A1) AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25867 WP No. 20779 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Heard the learned Senior counsel, Sri. Dhananjay Joshi along with Sri. Purnachandra M. Puranik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. B.T. Kollar, learned AGA appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Sri. K. Prasanna Shetty, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5. 2. Learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing the matter at length, would seek leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and avail of such remedy as is available in law. The petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 3 Sl No.: 21