- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40606 CRP No. 223 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 223 OF 2018 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BYCHAMMA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, W/O. LATE SRI. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, 2. SMT. VENKATAMMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, D/O. LATE SRI. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, 3. SRI. T. C. AMARESH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRI. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, 4. SRI. T. C. NANJUNDAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRI. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, 5. SRI. T. M. NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRI. MUNISHAMAPPA, 6. SRI. T. M. DODDAMUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRI. MUNISHAMAPPA, 7. SRI. T. M. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40606 CRP No. 223 of 2018 S/O. LATE SRI. MUNISHAMAPPA, 8. SRI. GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRI. T. M. DODDAPPA, 9. SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRI. T. M. DODDAPPA, 10. SRI. RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRI. T. M. DODDAPPA, 11. SRI. MUNE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRI. T. M. DODDAPPA, 12. SMT. SAMPANGAMMA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, W/O. SRI. T. M. NANJAPPA, 13. SRI. T. N. MUNISWAMY GOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O. SRI. T. M. NANJAPPA, 14. SRI. T. M. KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O. SRI. T. M. DODDAMUNIYAPPA, 15. SRI. T. M. RAVI KUMAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O. SRI. T. M. DODDAMUNIYAPPA, ALL ARE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDING AT THIMMAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40606 CRP No. 223 of 2018 BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 121. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C SHANKAR REDDY AND C. VENKATESHA, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SMT. NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, D/O. LATE SRI. MUNIVEERAPPA @ ERAPPA AND W/O. SRI. RAMAPPA, RESIDING AT BESTHENAHALLI VILLAGE, HOLUR HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 139. 2. SMT. SHANTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O. LATE SRI. T. M. VENKATESHAPPA, 3. SRI. T. V. MURALIDHARA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRI. T. M. VENKATESHAPPA, 4. SMT. T. V. ROOPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, D/O. LATE SRI. T. M. VENKATESHAPPA, 5. SMT. T. V. ROHINI AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, D/O. LATE SRI. T. M. VENKATESHAPPA, THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT THIMMAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 121. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40606 CRP No. 223 of 2018 6. SRI. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRI. CHIKKANARAYANAPPA, RESIDING AT MARAGAL VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 121. 7. SMT. RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE SRI. SONNAPPA, AND WIFE OF SRI. SRINIVASAPPA, RESIDING AT YEDAHALLI VILLAGE, T.D. HALLI POST, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 125. 8. SMT. MENASAMMA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, W/O. SRI. MUNISHAMAPPA, AND D/O. SMT. VENKATAMMA, RESIDING AT CHADUMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT-563 125. 9. SMT. BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, D/O. LATE SRI. T. M. DODDAPPA, RESIDING AT THIMMAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 121. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.3.2018 PASSED ON IA NO.5 IN OS NO.13/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40606 CRP No. 223 of 2018 PRL. JMFC, KGF, REJECTING THE IA NO.V FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as under: " The petitioners submit that they have preferred the above revision petition challenging the order dated 12.03.2018 passed on IA no.5 filed by the petitioners herein for rejection of the plaint filed in OS no.13/2015 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at K.G.F. No stay is granted in the above revision petition. In view of the same, the suit has been proceeded with on merits and has reached final stages. Hence, reserving liberty to raise all these contentions involved in the above Civil Revision Petition in the suit when the same is considered on merits, the above Civil Revision Petition may be disposed of as withdrawn. Pray for orders accordingly.'' Placing the memo on record, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34