REYAZ AHMAD v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH HOME DEPTT AND ORS
WP(C)/4377/2019 · 2025-03-17
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5754 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5754 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 4377/2019 CM No. 9239/2019
Reyaz Ahmad
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
vs
UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 17.03.2025
1. None present for the petitioner.
2. It appears that no one has been appearing on behalf of the petitioner for the last many dates of hearing. In fact the petition has been filed in the year 2019 and till date the matter has not been considered even for admission. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition, as such, the instant petition along with the connected application is dismissed for non prosecution.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
Jammu 17.03.2025 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No.
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
Serial No. 164 Sahil Padha 2025.03.26 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document