Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57538 (ALL)

JAYPAL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

NA529/1420/2025 · 2025-05-15

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:81621 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1420 of 2025 Applicant :- Jaypal Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Misc. Case (Criminal) No. 302 of 2024 under Section 175 (3) BNSS, Police Station - Chaubia, District- Etawah pending in the Court of Additional District Judge, Court No.7 (D.A.A.), Etawah expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in the aforesaid case. It is further submitted that the application under Section 175 (3) BNSS was treated as a criminal complaint by the learned trial Court on 8.1.2025 but since then no statement under Section 223 BNSS has been recorded so far by the learned trial Court. Notices were also ordered to be sent to the opposite parties but the same has not been served causing unnecessary delay in the disposal of the case. The trial court is not taking any interest for disposal of the case. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed that if the notices to the opposite parties is required before recording the statement of the complainant under Section 223 of BNSS, the trial Court shall adopt all possible measures to procure the presence by sending appropriate process to them within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and thereafter all endeavours shall be made by it for expeditious disposal of the case, keeping in view the heavy work load in the said Court. 6. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder of the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 7. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad