Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9805] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1708/2025 Manoj S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Kesarpura, Police Station Bijaynagar, District Beawar (Raj.). (Accused Petitioner Currently Confined In District Jail Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary Mr. Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 04/03/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.251/2024 registered at Police Station Vijay Nagar, District Beawar for the offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 341(2) & 61(2)(a) of BNS.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submit that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that entire offence is based on documents and same are in possession of investigating agency.
Learned counsel contend that petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 13.01.2025. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion.
[2025:RJ-JP:9805] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1708/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor oppose the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that there is serious allegation against the petitioner that he prepared the forged documents and tried to take loan on the basis.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; entire offence is based on documents; petitioner has no criminal antecedents as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Manoj S/o Mohan Lal, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded.
[2025:RJ-JP:9805] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1708/2025]
8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.
9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /133