1 2025:CGHC:61166-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3790 of 2025 Manoharlal Choudhary S/o Late Umed Ram Choudhary Aged About 65 Years R/o Om Shanti Vihar Colony (Plot No. 14), Kotra Road, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2. District Magistrate Ambikapur, Sarguja, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Palak Mishra, Advocate For Respondents/ State: Mr. Soumya Rai, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 16/12/2025 1. Heard Ms. Palak Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Soumya Rai, learned P.L. for the respondents/ State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following Prayer:- “It is therefore most humbly and respectfully prayed that JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.12.17 10:48:56 +0530 2 this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR No. 694/1992 registered at police station Ambikapur Chhattisgarh(then M.P) for offence U/S 420,468,467,471,34 of IPC and section 13 (1)(d) and 13(2) of prevention of corruption Act(Annexure P/1) so far as the petitioner is concerned.” 3. From perusal of the prayer and pleadings made in the present petition, it transpires that the petitioner has prayed for quashment of the FIR of the year 1992. But there is no pleading about the further proceeding along with order sheets of concerned court. In the opinion of this Court, the pleading of petition is defective as the petitioner has not filled the complete order sheet of the trial court showing the status of the trial which shows that the prayer drafted by learned counsel for the petitioner is in a casual manner. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. 5. Learned State counsel has no objection. 6. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 7. Certified copies of the documents, if any, may be returned to the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti