APHC010253152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1219/2025 Between: 1. DR. MOJJADA(SATTARU) RAJANI, A 2. MOJJADA SRI SAI SWAYAM PRAKASH BABU, REP., BY GPA HOLDER DR. MOJJADA RAMAKRISHNA S/O MOJJADA LATE APPANNA, AGED 66 YEARS, DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (RETD.),R/O. OF ALLADA VILLAGE, JALUMURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DR MOJJADA DHANUNJAYA RAO, S/o Late M. Appanna, aged 46 years. Pulmonologist, R/o. Flat No. 101, Satyam Enclave, Sana Street, DCCB Colony, Srikakulam, permanent resident of Allada Village, Jalumuru Mandal, Srikakulam District, and also C/o Medical clinic, one way traffic road, near Sindhura Nursing home, Srikakulam. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to consider the above said Revisional grounds so as to declare the action of the Trial Court, in ordering urgent notice in the lA. No. 215 of 2025 in O.S No. 22 of 2025, pending on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Kotabaommali, Srikakulam District, without there being any reason and not properly appreciating the urgency explained by the Petitioners/plaintiffs in the subject matter of the main suit and consequently order for Injunction as sought for by the Petitioners/plaintiffs to preserve the possession of the plaint schedule lands owned by the plaintiffs and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant injunction restraining the respondent herein his men and agents from ever interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule lands or any other appropriate orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, pending disposal of the CRP in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GNANESWARA RAO MITTIREDDI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: ::ORDER :: The above civil revision petition has been filed against the docket order dated 02.04.2025, passed in I.A.No.215 of 2025 in O.S.No.22 of 2025 on the file of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kotabommali, Srikakulam District. 2. Heard Sri Bilaal Ahmed Syed, learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. The petitioners, being the plaintiffs, filed a suit in O.S.No.22 of 2025 against the defendants seeking a perpetual injunction. Along with the suit, the petitioners filed I.A.No.215 of 2025 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 and Section 94(C) r/w Section 151 of C.P.C for the grant of an Ad-interim injunction. The Trial Court, by docket order dated 02.04.2025, ordered urgent notice to the respondents and adjourned the I.A., to 05.05.2025. 4. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner confined his arguments and urged to direct the Trial Court to dispose of the I.A.No.215 of 2025. Learned counsel would also submit that the respondents filed a counter- affidavit in the said I.A. The same is recorded. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, directing the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kotabommali, Srikakulam District, to dispose of the I.A.No.215 of 2025 in O.S.No.22 of 2025 as expeditiously as possible, strictly as per law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 10.10.2025 TVN 120 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETTION No.1219 OF 2025 Date: 10.10.2025 TVN