Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57525 (CHH)

RAJKUMAR BANJARA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13297/2025 · 2025-11-24

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:57181 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13297 of 2025 • Rajkumar Banjara S/o Late Shri Dhallo Ram Banjara, Aged About 35 Years Occupation- Clerk At Adim Jati Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Kotba, R/o- Nagar Panchayat Kotba, Police Station And Tahsil Bagbahar, District Jashpur (C.G.) Mo.No. 7987285792 ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Raipur, Police Station- Rakhi, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Assistant Registrar Cum Co-Operative Commissioner, Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Authorized Officer, Adim Jati Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Kotba, District Jashpur (C.G.) 5. Society Manager Adim Jati Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Kotba, District Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 25.11.2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 06.11.2025 MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.11.27 11:09:05 +0530 2 passed by the respondent No. 4 by which the services of the petitioner have been terminated. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seek permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to raise dispute against the order dated 16.11.2025 passed by the respondent No. 4 before the Co-operative Commissioner under Section 55(2) of the Chhattisgarh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. If the dispute is raised within 45 days neither the respondent nor the adjudicating authorities shall take plea of limitation and the respondent authority shall decide the dispute on its own merit. 5. With aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish