Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5751 (PAT)

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Saw @ Pappu Sah v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./80094/2025 · 2026-03-31

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80094 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-503 Year-2025 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Saw @ Pappu Sah S/o- Late Dina Nath Sah R/v- Imali Chowk Raipura, PS- Fatuha, Dist- Patna 2. Rajani Devi W/o- Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Saw @ Pappu Sah R/v- Imali Chowk Raipura, PS- Fatuha, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. XXXX W/o- YYY R/v- Raipura Ward no. 21 PS- Fatuha Dist- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Ambastha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 65(1), 77, 137(2), 96, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Sections 3(1)(r)(s)(w) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Sections 4, 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. 3. As per F.I.R., co-accused Shubham Kumar kidnapped minor daughter of the informant. These petitioners are parents of co-accused Shubham Kumar. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80094 of 2025(4) dt.31-03-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have been made accused in this case merely because happen to be parents of co-accused Shubham Kumar. Victim in her statement, recorded under Section 183 BNSS has not alleged any wrong against these petitioners. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering nature of accusation and statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-VII cum Special Judge POCSO, Patna in connection with Fathuha P. S. Case No. 503 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T