RIAZ AHMED AND ORS. v. VINOD KOUL,SECY.REVENUE AND ANR.
CPSW/382/2013 · 2025-02-17
Sindhu Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5751 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5751 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 61 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 382/2013
Riaz Ahmed and Ors.
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None
V/s
Vinod Koul, Secy, Revenue and anr.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Saliqa Shiekh, Advocate
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER 17.02.2025
Petitioner seek the implementation of the judgment/order passed by this Court 16.10.2012 vide which the respondents were directed to consider the claim of the petitioners for their deputation to undergo patwar training in light of the observations made in this Order.
Respondents have filed their statement of facts and have submitted that in compliance to the order passed by the Court on 16.10.2012 the claim of the petitioners has been considered.
In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed.
(Sindhu Sharma)
Judge
Jammu 17.02.2025 Javid Iqbal