NIRMAL SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
LPA/1467/2025 · 2025-05-16
Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57504 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57504 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
LPA-1467-2025 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
LPA-1467-2025 (O&M) Date of decision:16.05.2025
NIRMAL SINGH & ORS.
……Appellants
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
…..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
Present:- Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for appellants.
Mr. Kuljit Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
SUDHIR SINGH, J.
CM-3584-LPA-2025
For the reasons given in the application, same is allowed. Delay of 39 days in filing the appeal is condoned. LPA-1467-2025
Challenge in the present appeal is to the order dated 04.03.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellants was dismissed.
2.
It may be noticed that this Court in LPA-875-2025 titled as Sukhwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors., decided on 15.05.2025, has adjudicated upon an identical issue, as the one involved in the present Letters Patent Appeal. HIMANSHU 2025.07.09 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
LPA-1467-2025 (O&M)
-2-
3.
In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed in the same terms as in LPA-875-2025, decided on 15.05.2025 (supra).
4.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
[ SUDHIR SINGH ]
JUDGE
[ ALOK JAIN ]
JUDGE
16.05.2025 himanshu
Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No Whether reportable
Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.07.09 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.