APHC010329802021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19937/2021 Between: 1. MANGALI SUBBARAYUDU, S/O.VENKATA SUBBAIAH , HINDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. GODIGANUR VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 2. GANGANABOINA SUBBA RAO,, HINDU, S/O. PEDDA SUBBA RAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YRS, R/O. GODIGANUR VILLAGE AND CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. GANGANABOINA SUBBA SEKHAR,, S/O. PEDDA SUBBA RAYUDU , HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YRS, GODIGANUR VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATECUMREVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATECUMTAHSILDAR, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. PATTI NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50YRS, S/O. PEDDATHIRUPALU, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, GODIGANUR VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAGESWARA RAO V Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. P NAGENDRA REDDY The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings in MC.No.658/2021, dated 28.08.2021 issued by 3rd Respondent to initiate proceedings under section 145 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and consequential action of 3rd respondent in insisting the petitioners to vacate from their lands, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and offends articles 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently quash the same.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of since the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, leaned Assistant Public Prosecutor for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19937 of 2021 Dt.09.10.2025 Dinesh