CRM-M-28960-2024 - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 291 CRM-M-28960-2024 Date of decision: 11.02.2025 DIVYANSH VERMA ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR ***** Present : Mr. Abhimanyu Balyan, Advocate and Mr. Raina Godara, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harkesh Kumar, AAG, Haryana. Ms. Vatsal Raj, Advocate with Mr. A.S. Panghal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** HARPREET SINGH BRAR , J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel, at the very outset submits that the present petition is not maintainable as only the complainant has been impleaded as a respondent, whereas, two of the injured namely Meenakshi and Vikas are not impleaded as respondents, who are the victims and their consent is necessary for compounding the offence. 2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition after impleading all the accused and stakeholders. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 11.02.2025 Amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.02.13 22:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment