DINESH KUMAR VERMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/6579/2025 · 2025-05-19
Ajit Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57476 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57476 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84192 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6579 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Verma And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akansha Srivastava,Udayan Nandan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
1. Heard Sri Udayan Nandan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri P.K. Srivastava, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioners have prayed following main relief:-
"To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to accord consideration to the pending Representations/ Applications dated 21.01.2025 & 22.04.2025 preferred by the petitioners before taking any coercive action against the petitioners and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law; concluding the enquiry within a stipulated time period."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioners have preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.2 and this Court may direct opposite party no.2 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioners are permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no. 2 i.e. The Director General, U.P. Vigilance Establishment, TCV 44, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of ten days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid
representation of the petitioners by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioners forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 20.5.2025 IrfanUddin Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad