APHC010836192018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 40376/2018 Between: 1. JK SWAPNA, W/O J.P. SHYAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. DR. NO. 18/4/38, PEDDA BAZAR, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY (MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE NELLORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, NELLORE., REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. VAKATI RAVINDRA REDDY, S/O NARAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/O. H.NO.28-1-1953, KONDAYAPALEM, WARD NO. 20, NELLORE CITY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by questioning the action of 2nd respondent, who was not consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 22.09.2018 and failed to take steps against the 3rd respondent by initiating an enquiry on the illegal encroachment of the 30 feet layout Road between the Plot No.5 and Plot No.6 in Survey No.255, 262, 263A, 263B-1 of Kondayapalem, Nellore City and 2 causing obstructions the road for ingress and egress to the petitioner and to the general public is illegal arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to enquire into the matter and file a report before this Honourable court and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to enquire in the issues raised by the petitioner in the representation, dated 22.09.2018 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and become infructuous. 2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt. 09.10.2025 SR