Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57471 (AP)

Chedde Latha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh RADESH

WP/9629/2021 · 2025-10-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010159472021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9629/2021 Between: 1. CHEDDE LATHA, W/O CHEDDE MALLIKARJUNA AGED ABOUT 34 YRS R/O H.NO.9/138, SOGANUR ROAD YEMMIGANUR TOWN KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH RADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YEMMIGANUR TOWN POLICE STATION, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9629 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.4 in directing the petitioner to vacate from the dwelling house situated in an extent of 85 Sq.Yds in Sy.No.93C of Yemmiganur town, Kurnool District, further not acting upon as per Sec.154 Cr.P.C. in pursuant to the complaint, dt.01-04- 2021 submitted by the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment over property of the petitioner situated in an extent of 85 Sq.Yds in Sy.No.93C of Yemmiganur town, Kurnool District…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.10.2025. UPS 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 9629 of 2021 Dated.09.10.2025 UPS 130