K PRANADMAN v. T.T.D., REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND 2 OTHERS
WP/8245/2017 · 2025-10-09
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57470 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57470 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010555952017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8245/2017 Between:
1. K PRANADMAN, S/O.KUPPASWAMY GOUNDER, OCCU:
CONTRACTUAL EMPLOYEE, R/O. CHEELAPALLI VILLAGE, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. T T D REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND 2 OTHERS, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDINGS, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT., REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
3. THE ASST EXECUTIVE OFFICERPOTU TIRUMALA, TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KEERTHI KIRAN KOTA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CH MURALI KRISHNA (SC FOR TTD)
The Court made the following ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Keerthi Kiran Kota, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent events in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication.
2. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 10.10.2025 Ivd
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.8245 of 2017
Date: 10.10.2025
Ivd