IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 908 of 2025 Decided on: 10th January, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bindu Kumari …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Dalip Kumar Sharma, Additional Advocate General ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Dalip Kumar Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the legal issue involved in the case has already been adjudicated upon; Petitioner has filed a representation for the redressal of her grievances raised in the writ petition, but till date the same has not been adjudicated upon; Petitioner would be satisfied in case competent authority is 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 directed to decide the representation in accordance with law within a time bound schedule. The above is not objected to by learned Additional Advocate General. 3. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 16.9.2024 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 10, 2025 Judge veena