Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5747 (BOM)

SUMAN W/O. SONSING RATHOD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/53/2020 · 2025-10-07

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Smt Vaishali Patil Jadhav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

926 cr wp 53 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 53 OF 2020 Suman W/o. Sonsing Rathod VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others … • Mr. Ade Ravindra B., Advocate for the Petitioner • Mr. K. S. Patil, APP for Respondent/s – State • Adv. B. N. Magar h/f. Mr. C. C. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 07, 2025 P E R C O U R T : 1. By this petition, petitioner seeks direction against the respondents to register an offence against respondent nos. 3 and 4 on the complaint made by the petitioner on 08.11.2019, 09.11.2019 and 11.11.2019 thereby alleging sexual harassment. 2. Respondent No. 2 – Police Inspector, Human Resources, Jalgaon. Tq. & Dist. Jalgaon, filed affidavit-in-reply stating that an inquiry was conducted into the allegations of the petitioner by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Faizpur Division and it was revealed that there was no evidence against respondent nos. 3 and 4. It is, therefore, stated in the affidavit that since there is no iota of evidence against the two police officers, the respondents are not komal kamble 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:28491-DB 926 cr wp 53 2020 inclined to register First Information Report on the allegations of the petitioner. 3. Taking into consideration, the statements made in the affidavit-in-reply, we find no substance in the petition. Criminal Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of. Petitioner may avail appropriate remedy in law if she is aggrieved by the said decision. [VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble 2/2