Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57448 (AP)

SMT AKULA RANI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/17228/2021 · 2025-10-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010293712021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17228/2021 Between: 1. SMT AKULA RANI, W/O LATE RAJA SEKHAR AGE 48 (HOUSE WIFE) R/O DOOR NO.10/371-5 BESIDE B.C. BOYS HOSTEL, NAGAVARAPADU, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SRI AKULA DINESH,, S/O LATE RAJA SEKHAR, AGE. 29 R/O DOOR NO.10/371-5, BESIDE B.C. BOYS HOSTEL, NAGAVARAPADU, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. MS. AKULA MOUNIKA,, D/O LATE RAJA SEKHAR, AGE. 24 R/O DOOR NO.10/371-5BESIDE B.C. BOYS HOSTEL, NAGAVARAPADU, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GANAPAVARAM CIRCLE, GANAPAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SRI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, CIRCLE INSPECTOR, GANAPAVARAM CIRCLE, GANAPAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NIDAMARRU POLICE STATION, NIDAMARRU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. SRI K GURRAIAH, S/O NOT KNOWN, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NIDAMARRU POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. SARIPALLI MARY JYOTHSNA, W/O DINESH, AGE.29, DOOR NO.1-94, R AND B ROAD, ENEKAPALLI, NIDAMARRU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. CELL- 8179297277 9. SRI PUTCHAKAYALA VINAYAK, , C/O RATNAM, R/O D NO.2-29, NEAR CBM COMPOUND, S C COLONY, GANAPAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. CELL9848668866, 9866377399. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 2. MANOHAR KALANGI The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 4 to 7 in harassing the petitioners and trying to squeeze huge wrongful money from them and threatening to foist false criminal cases against them at the instance of 8th and 9th respondents, is totally unjustified, illegal, unauthorized and misuse and abuse of statutory power.” 2. Ms.Aishwarya Nagula, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Respondent Nos.4 to 7 are harassing the Petitioners and threatening to foist false criminal cases against them at the instance of Respondent Nos.8 and 9. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint of Respondent No.8, a case in Crime No.239 of 2021 for the offences under Section 498-A read with 34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been registered against Petitioner Nos.1 and 2. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police to follow due process of law regarding the crime registered against the Petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17228 of 2021 Dt.09.10.2025 Dinesh