115 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. which was deducted by the respondent Provident Fund Account sought to released only on Institution to the Providen 2. petitioner is amount, the s respondents be directed to rectify the mistake and release the benefit admissible to t 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI CWP-14092 Date of Decision : 21 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate for the respondent-Union of India *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner was deducted by the respondent- Provident Fund Account sought to be rel eleased only on the ground that the spelling of Institution to the Provident Fund Authorities was different. Learned counsel for the petitioner s petitioner is “KRISHAN KUMAR” whereas the same has been recorded as nts be directed to rectify the mistake and release the benefit ble to the petitioner. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 14092-2025 Date of Decision : 21-05-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate Advocate Union of India. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) petitioner submits that the contribution -Institution and deposited with the be released to the petitioner is not being the spelling of the name as provided by the ities was different. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the whereas, while depositing the said ame has been recorded as “KRISHNA KUMAR” hence, t nts be directed to rectify the mistake and release the benefit ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI the contribution ited with the not being the name as provided by the ubmits that the name of the while depositing the said e, the nts be directed to rectify the mistake and release the benefit SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.21 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14092-2025 -2- 4. Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the name of the petitioner had already been corrected and now the petitioner has to apply online for the release of the benefit and as and when the petitioner applies, the same will be considered and an appropriate action for the release of the dues of the petitioner be done as expeditiously as possible prefereably within a period of 8 weeks of the filing of the application form. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of the learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further at this stage with liberty to approach the respondents for redressal of their grievance. 7. Ordered accordingly. 21-05-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.21 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document