Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57442 (KAR)

MR. GIRISH RAMAN UNNI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/3245/2022 · 2025-07-14

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25949 CRL.P No. 3245 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3245 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. MR. GIRISH RAMAN UNNI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO. B1-502, CITRUS VENTURES ARIES LAKEVIEW, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, JAKKURU VILLAGE, NEAR JAKKUR RAILWAY CROSSING, BENGALURU-560 064. 2. MR. GOPAL IYENGAR JAYAHARI SAMPATH IYENGAR, S/O SAMPATH IYENGAR AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO. B6-502, CITRUS VENTURES ARIES LAKEVIEW, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, JAKKURU VILLAGE, NEAR JAKKUR RAILWAY CROSSING, BENGALURU-560 064, ALSO AT NO.311, PANCHAVATI APARTMENT, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, NEAR RAMAMANDIR, SRIRAMPURA, BENGALURU-560 021. 3. RANGANATH B. DESHPANDE S/O BANDURAO B. DESHPANDE AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, Digitally signed by VALLI MARIMUTHU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25949 CRL.P No. 3245 of 2022 R/AT FLAT NO. A2-101, CITRUS VENTURES ARIES LAKEVIEW, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, JAKKURU VILLAGE, NEAR JAKKUR RAILWAY CROSSING, BENGALURU-560 064, …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIKRAM UNNI RAJAGOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER NO.2; SRI ANIL THOMAS, ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER NOS.1 AND 3) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY AMRUTHAHALLI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560 037, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SMT. SWATHI NAYAK W/O SRI BHAGAVAL DAS, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO. B3-101, CITRUS VENTURES ARIES LAKEVIEW, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, JAKKURU VILLAGE, NEAR JAKKUR RAILWAY CROSSING, BENGALURU-560 064, …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VENKAT SATYANARAYAN.A, HCGP FOR R1; SMT.SWATHI NAYAK, PARTY-IN-PERSON -R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED COMPLAINT DATED 19.06.2021 (ANNEXURE B) FILED BY RESPONDENT NO. 2 AND IMPUGNED FIR DATED 19.06.2021 (ANNEXURE A) IN CRIME NO. 132 /2021 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 IN RELATION TO OFFENCES UNDER SECTION 428, 429, 503, 504, 506, 507, 509 R/W 34 OF IPC 1860. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25949 CRL.P No. 3245 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioners have sought for the following relief: "a. Quash the Impugned Complaint dated 19.06.2021 (Annexure-B) filed by Respondent No.2 and Impugned FIR dated 19.06.2021 (Annexure-A) in Crime No.132/2021 registered by the Respondent No.1 in relation to offences under Sections 428, 429, 503, 504,506,507,509 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; b) Quash the charge sheet dated 04.10.2021 (Annexure-C) filed by Respondent No.1 Police in relation to offences under Sections 504, 506, 509 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and consequently quash all further proceedings pursuant thereto in C.C.No.35139/2021 pending on the file of the 7th Addl. ACMM Court, Nrupatunga Road, Bangalore City (Annexure-D)." 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner Nos.1 and 3 and learned counsel for the petitioner No.2 as well as the respondent No.2-party-in-person, who is physically present and perused the material on record. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25949 CRL.P No. 3245 of 2022 3. Respondent No.2-Party-in-person, who is physically present submits that subsequent to the incident in question, respondent No.2 has vacated the premises and as such she has no objection for the impugned FIR and charge sheet to be quashed subject to the condition that the petitioners undertake that they will not harass or trouble the Monkeys or Dogs or other animals in future. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioners jointly submits that without prejudice to the rights and contentions and without admitting the allegations made against them by respondent No.2, the petitioners would undertake that they will not henceforth harass or trouble any animals including Monkeys or Dogs etc. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the joint submission made by both sides, I deem it just and appropriate to quash the impugned proceedings and by recording the undertaking given on behalf of the petitioners. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25949 CRL.P No. 3245 of 2022 6. In the result, I pass the following ORDER (i) The petition is hereby allowed. (ii) The impugned FIR dated 19.06.2021 in Crime No.132/2021, charge sheet dated 04.10.2021 and all further proceedings in C.C. No.35139/2021 pending on the file of the VII Addl.C.M.M. Court, Nrupatunga Road, Bangalore City, insofar as petitioners/accused Nos.1 t o 3 are concerned, are hereby quashed. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6