Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57441 (AP)

Mopada Satya Venkata Ramesh, S/o. Mopada Rama Rao, v. A.P. Social Welfare Residential School/Junior College,

WP/39398/2016 · 2025-10-09

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010882212016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 39398/2016 Between: 1. MOPADA SATYA VENKATA RAMESH, S/O. MOPADA RAMA RAO,, OCC: HEALTH SUPERVISOR, APSW RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL/ JUNIOR COLLEGE (BOYS), SRIKRISHNAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, R/O. SF-1, STAFF QUARTERS, APSWRS/JC (B), SRIKRISHNAPURAM, NEAR NEW CENTRAL JAIL, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. A P SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL/JUNIOR COLLEGE, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SRIKRISHNAPURAM, NEAR NEW CENTRAL JAIL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE SECRETARY A P STATE SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL, EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, TADEPALLI, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, THE DISTRICT SC COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, A.P, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not paying the HRA to the petitioner after deducting the rent amount as fixed to the petitioner as was 2 done in the cases of similarly situated Junior Lecturers and other staff of the APSW Residential School/Junior College, Srikrishnapuram, Near New Central Jail, Visakhapatnam and consequently direct the respondents to pay the HRA after deducting the fixed rent to the petitioner and further direct the respondents to pay the arrears of HRA IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 48551 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to pay the HRA after deducting the fixed rent to the petitioner as was done in the similarly situated staff by extending the interim orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.N0.18774/2014 in W.P.NO.15152/2014 dated 06.06.2014 and W.P.M.P.N0.13281/2016 in W.P.NO.10542/2016 dated 04.04.2016 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S JAGADISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. L V S NAGARAJU (SC FOR APREIS) 2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP) The court made the following ORDER:- When the matter is called, Sri Sanjay Gandhi Bathula, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition becomes infructuous. 2. Recording the above said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 10.10.2025 GVK 3 38 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.39398 of 2016 Date: 10.10.2025 GVK